-
“Yes, but it could be composed in a number of ways:
“2, 2, 2, 2, 2, 2, 2, 2, 2, 1 gives a different view of the data than
“10, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 9 e.g. date range picked for best effect (bad surgeon one year? bus crash?) or
“10, 7, 2, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0 e.g. problem in the past more than recently”
Simon,
I understand your question, but if we assume either of the extremes you cite it would not change the hard count and it would not suggest we’d find something different over the span of 1961 to 2007, which is the period of my extrapolation.
If we assume the earlier years had higher mortalities because of the state of medical science in the treatment of severe anemia among patients refusing blood then using the mitigated average would be make for a conservative extrapolation, meaning the extrapolation would not be an overstatement but, if anything, and understatement.
If we assume the earlier years had higher mortalities because of the then state of Watchtower doctrine prohibiting more blood products then using the mitigated average would make for a conservative extrapolation, meaning the extrapolation would not be an overstatement but, if anything, and understatement.
I checked Beliaev’s other work using the same data set and none spell out the annual value of deaths.
Marvin Shilmer